Summary:
Frozen embryo transfers (FETs) and fresh embryo transfers (ETs) have been hotly debated in the world of assisted reproductive technology (ART). While fresh ETs have been the standard practice for many years, there is growing evidence that FETs may actually be a better option for certain patients. In this blog post, we will break the mold and challenge conventional wisdom by exploring the benefits and drawbacks of both FETs and fresh ETs, and why FETs may be the better choice for some individuals.
First, let’s define what FETs and fresh ETs are. FETs involve freezing embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and then thawing and transferring them at a later date, while fresh ETs involve transferring embryos immediately after they are created. Historically, fresh ETs have been the preferred method due to their higher success rates. However, recent studies have shown that FETs may actually offer a number of advantages over fresh ETs.
One of the main benefits of FETs is that they allow for better timing and preparation. With fresh ETs, the timing of the transfer is often based on the woman’s natural menstrual cycle, which can be unpredictable. This can result in transfers being cancelled or performed at a less-than-optimal time. FETs, on the other hand, allow for better control over the timing of the transfer. This can be especially beneficial for women with irregular cycles or those undergoing additional treatments such as egg retrievals or genetic testing.
Another advantage of FETs is that they can improve success rates for certain groups of patients. Studies have shown that FETs may be more beneficial for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), as their bodies may respond poorly to the high hormone levels associated with fresh ETs. Additionally, FETs may be a better option for women with endometriosis, as the inflammation and scarring associated with the condition can make it more difficult for embryos to implant during a fresh transfer.
FETs also eliminate the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), a potentially dangerous side effect of IVF that can occur with fresh ETs. OHSS occurs when the ovaries become enlarged and fluid accumulates in the abdomen, which can lead to severe discomfort and even hospitalization. While OHSS is rare, it is more likely to occur in women with PCOS or those who produce a high number of eggs during IVF. FETs bypass this risk entirely, making them a safer option for these patients.

Breaking the Mold: Challenging Conventional Wisdom on Frozen vs. Fresh Embryo Transfers
In addition to these medical benefits, FETs can also offer financial and emotional advantages. With fresh ETs, couples often feel pressure to transfer all of their embryos in one cycle in order to avoid the cost and stress of additional rounds of IVF. However, this can result in multiple pregnancies, which carry their own risks and complications. FETs, on the other hand, allow couples to transfer embryos one at a time, reducing the risk of multiple pregnancies and giving them more control over their family planning.
Furthermore, FETs can be more cost-effective in the long run. While the upfront cost of freezing and storing embryos may seem daunting, it can actually save couples money in the long term. If a fresh transfer is unsuccessful, couples may need to go through additional rounds of IVF, which can be expensive. By freezing embryos and using them for FETs, couples may be able to avoid the cost of multiple IVF cycles.
Of course, there are still some drawbacks to FETs. One of the main concerns is the potential for lower success rates compared to fresh ETs. However, recent studies have shown that this may not be the case for all patients. In fact, for certain groups of patients, such as those with PCOS, FETs may actually result in higher success rates.
Another concern is the potential damage to embryos during the freezing and thawing process. However, with advancements in technology and techniques, the survival rates of frozen embryos have greatly improved. In fact, some studies have shown that the survival rates of frozen embryos may be even higher than fresh embryos.
So, what does this all mean for those considering ART? Ultimately, the decision between FETs and fresh ETs should be made on an individual basis, taking into account factors such as medical history, financial considerations, and personal preferences. It’s important to consult with a fertility specialist who can provide personalized recommendations based on your specific situation.
In conclusion, while fresh ETs have been the standard practice for many years, it’s important to challenge conventional wisdom and consider the benefits of FETs. From better timing and preparation to improved success rates and reduced risks, FETs may be the better option for certain individuals. As technology and research continue to advance, it’s possible that FETs may become the new norm in the world of ART.
Leave a Reply